113-9 Q-FORM PROCESS
Note:
This process requires forwarding of the e-mail and attachments.
The following charts show the process for responding to Q-Forms for all programs.
QUALITY ASSESSMENT Q-FORM PROCESS
If QA Reviewer finds the review is:
a ”No Error” case |
Send Q-Form and original hard copy of review documents to QA Supervisor. |
an "Error” case |
Send Q-Form and original hard copy of review documents to QA Supervisor. |
If QA Supervisor finds the Q-Form is:
a ”No Error” case |
Send hard copy of the Review Schedule to QA Research Analyst.
Forward e-mail Q-Form to QA Research Analyst, and the regional designee. |
a ”No Error” case with "Information Only" |
Send hard copy of the Review Schedule to QA Research Analyst.
Forward e-mail Q-Form to QA Research Analyst, DPA Policy, and the regional designee. |
an ”Error” case |
Forward e-mail Q-Form to QA Research Analyst, QARC core membership, and the regional designee. |
If Regional Office Designee finds the Q-Form is:
a ”No Error” case |
File or forward as directed by regional manager. |
a ”No Error” case with ”Information Only” |
Forward e-mail Q-Form to district office manager or unit supervisor.
File and follow up as directed by regional manager. |
an ”Error” case |
Forward e-mail Q-Form to district office manager or unit supervisor to prepare for QARC .
File and follow up as directed by regional manager when QARC process is complete. |
If the District Office Manager or Unit Supervisor finds the Q-Form is:
a ”No Error” case |
File as directed by regional manager. |
a ”No Error” case with ”Information Only” |
Confirm information on the Q-Form is appropriately acted upon by caseworker, including case corrections and restored benefits or claims as appropriate. |
an ”Error” case and agrees with the QA error finding |
Consult with caseworker, program policy and QA staff, if necessary.
Take actions to ensure future months eligibility and benefit amount is correct.
Do not complete and submit a claim determination or fraud referral form or issue a restored benefit to correct the error month until the QARC concurs with the error and determines a restored benefit or claim is necessary.
Forward e-mail Q-Form to the regional manager or designee with a statement that you concur, along with explanation as to the cause of the error. Explain planned corrective actions to prevent future errors. |
an ”Error” case and disagrees with the QA error finding |
Consult with caseworker, program policy, and QA staff, if necessary.
Fax supporting documents to Policy Specialist, if appropriate.
Take actions to ensure future months eligibility and benefit amount is correct.
Do not complete and submit a claim determination or fraud referral form or issue a restored benefit to correct the error month until the QARC concurs with the error and determines a restored benefit or claim is necessary.
Forward e-mail Q-Form to regional manager or designee with additional information for non-concur. |
If the Policy Specialist receives an error Q-Form and:
Policy Specialist agrees with the QA error finding |
Discuss with QA and the field staff as needed.
|
Policy Specialist disagrees with the QA error finding |
Obtain supporting documents and begin research of current policy and regulations as it applies to the error challenge.
Consult with QA and field staff about error challenge, if appropriate.
Bring supporting documentation to the RAP committee meeting. |
If QA Program Officer or designee receives an error Q-Form and:
Policy Staff agree with QA error finding |
Research the FNS 310 and regulations. Bring supporting documentation to the RAP. |
Policy Staff disagree with QA error finding |
Discuss error finding with Policy Specialist.
Contact QA staff for additional support of QA finding.
Research the FNS 310 and regulations. Bring supporting documentation to the RAP . |
If QA and Policy staff during the RAP Committee Meeting:
agree on QA error finding |
Pass the relevant research documentation to the QARC for final review and findings. |
disagree with final QA error finding |
Submit relevant documentation of all issues to QA Reviewer with instructions to amend findings.
Notify QARC of amended findings prior to the next QARC meeting. |
If QARC members:
agree on QA error finding |
Pass the review to the QA Research Analyst for recording and transmission.
Identify causes and corrective actions. |
disagree with QA error finding |
Notify the QA Reviewer of the research documentation and instruct to amend findings based on the QARC decision.
Pass the relevant research documentation to the QA Research Analyst for recording and transmission. |
finds it needs more research information |
Notify the QA Reviewer of the needed research to obtain documentation. Reschedule the review for the next meeting. |
If the Research Analyst finds the Q-Form is:
a ”No Error” case |
Enter data from the Review Schedule into database and transmit data to FNS .
Make hard copy of Q-Form for files. |
an ”Error” case |
Notify QA Program Officer when Q-Form is due for transmission.
Confirm the QARC completed the process with a committee finding agreeing with the error or amending the error prior to entering data from the Review Schedule into the database.
Transmit completed Food Stamp reviews to FNS on the due date. |
pended for more research |
Monitor the FNS due date on Food Stamp reviews to ensure timely transmission.
Notify the QA Program Officer if the delay to the next QARC means untimely transmission. |
If the PI &A Public Assistance Analyst finds the Q-Form is an error case and the QARC agreed with the findings:
Research EIS to determine if caseworker made corrections as instructed by the QARC .
Confirm the caseworker completed a claim, fraud referral, or restored benefit as instructed by the QARC and policy. |
|
||
|
|